Why Would
You Want to Have Your Precious Baby in One of the FILTHIEST Places
in the United States: A Hospital?
Every
day in hospitals across, the United States wondrous medical procedures
rescue patients from the brink of death. But there's a catch.
In these same hospitals, hygiene is so inadequate that one out
of every twenty patients contracts an infection.
Infections
that have been nearly eradicated in some countries are raging through
American hospitals. In 2003, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiologists
of America warned that although hospitals have infection prevention
programs, "there is little evidence of control in most facilities."
The
danger is worsening because hospital infections, increasingly, cannot
be tamed with commonly–used antibiotics. One of the deadliest
germs is methicillin—resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(or MRSA). Patients who do survive MRSA often spend months in the
hospital and endure repeated surgeries to cut out infected tissue.
In 1974, 2 percent of Staph infections were MRSA. By 1995, the number
had climbed to 22%, in 2003 an alarming 57%, and now over 60%.
Denmark,
Holland, and Finland once faced similar rates, but brought them
down below 1 percent. How? Through rigorous hand hygiene, meticulous
cleaning of equipment and rooms in between patient use, testing
incoming patients for MRSA and other drug resistant bacteria, and
taking precautions to prevent transmission to other patients. Wheelchairs
and other equipment used to transport patients who test positive
for MRSA are not used for other patients, and hospital staff have
to change their uniforms and footwear after entering the rooms of
MRSA patients, before they are permitted in other areas of the hospital.
A few
hospitals—too few—in the United States are proving
these precautions work here too. The University of Virginia Hospital
eradicated MRSA. The Veterans Hospital in Pittsburgh reduced MRSA
by 85 percent in a pilot program. The University of Pittsburgh–Presbyterian
Medical Center slashed MRSA by 90 percent in the medical intensive
care units in a pilot program, and a Yale–affiliated hospital
in New Haven, Connecticut, cut MRSA infections by two thirds in
a surgical intensive care unit.13 Brigham and Women's Hospital
in Boston reduced MRSA bacteremia 77% in intensive care and 67%
hospital–wide. Twenty–nine healthcare institutions
in Iowa eliminated another drug–resistant germ, vancomycinresistant
Enterococcus (or VRE).
Unfortunately,
most U.S. hospitals have not implemented these precautions.
We
have the knowledge to prevent hospital infection deaths.
We
don't have to wait for a scientific breakthrough. ·Yet most
hospitals have failed to act.
The
situation is growing more dangerous because, increasingly, hospital
infections cannot be cured with commonly-used antibiotics.
U.S.
Hospital Infection Essential Facts:
-
Infections
contracted in hospitals are the fourth largest killer in America.
Every year in this country, two million patients' contract infections
in hospitals, and an estimated 103,000 die as a result,
as many deaths as from AIDS, breast cancer, and auto accidents
combined.
-
A
few hospitals in the U.S.—too few—are proving that
infections are almost entirely preventable. How are
they doing it? Through rigorous hand hygiene, meticulous cleaning
of equipment and rooms in between patient use, testing incoming
patients to identify those carrying dangerous bacteria, and
taking precautions to prevent these bacteria from spreading
to other patients.
- In
2003, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiologists of America (SHEA)
announced the precautions that research proves can eradicate most
hospital infections. Yet only a few hospitals have taken
these precautions, and the CDC still has not called on all
hospitals to implement them.
- Hospital
infections add an estimated $30.5 billion to the nation's hospital
costs each year. Patients, insurers and taxpayers pay
part of that cost, but hospitals have to absorb much of the cost.
As a result, infections erode hospital profits. Preventing infections
can turn a financially failing hospital profitable.
-
Better infection prevention in hospitals is essential
to prepare the nation for avian flu or bioterrorism. If
avian flu were to wing its way to the U.S., the death toll would
depend largely on what American hospitals did when the first avian
flu patients were admitted. If hospitals have effective infection
controls in place, they can prevent bird flu from infecting other
patients who did not come in with it. If not, bird flu could sweep
through hospitals. Right now, most hospitals are woefully under
prepared. Hospitals have failed to stop the spread of ordinary
infections spread by touch and would not be able to contain flu
viruses, which are communicated by droplets from coughing and
sneezing as well as touch. Even more challenging would be small
pox, plague, and other bioterrorism weapons that can travel through
the air. Shoddy
infection control is poor preparation for a flu epidemic and poor
homeland security as well.
-
Hospital infection is a far deadlier problem than the
number of uninsured.
The Institute of Medicine estimates that as many as 18,000 people
a year die prematurely because they don't have health insurance.
That's tragic. But five times as many people die each year from
hospital infections, and most of them are insured.
Special
Implications for New Mothers and Babies
About
4% of Group B streptococcus (GBS) isolates demonstrate penicillin
tolerance (from Merck
Manual).
Consider alternative
treatment aimed at reducing colonization without relying on
antibiotics.
VRE
is not generally dangerous to healthy individuals with fully functioning
immune systems. However, it is very dangerous to newborn babies
because they have an immature
immune system that cannot cope with many different types of
germs. VRE is a drug–resistant germ, vancomycinresistant
Enterococcus (or VRE)
In
the U.S., most women give birth in hospitals. Unfortunately, the
emergence of VRE as an increasingly common pathogen can make the
hospital a very dangerous place for your baby. Hospitals
have always recommended that newborns be kept away from hospitals
because of the increased danger to their immature immune systems.
This danger becomes even more serious when the hospital germs cannot
be treated with antibiotics.
The
Center for Disease Control warns that the primary concern about
VRE is that it could easily share its resistance with staph bacteria,
which can easily infect a baby's skin. Two strains of staph resistant
to vancomycin were reported in the U.S. in the summer of 1997, and
it is expected that this number will increase rapidly.
What are the dangers to my baby?
There
are two primary dangers.
1)
The first is that your baby may be exposed to VRE or resistant staph
through contact with hospital equipment or personnel.
2)
The second is that you may become a VRE carrier and take the bacteria
to your home, where you may spread it to other family members, including
your new baby. Your own body might become an incubator for resistant
strep or staph, which could cause serious infection in your baby.
What are the dangers to me?
In
addition to the risks of becoming a carrier, you are at increased
risk for exposure every time the integrity of your skin is broken
by an IV or injection. An unnecessary episiotomy
or Cesarean wound puts you at particular risk.
Germs
introduced vaginally are particularly dangerous because if they
migrate to the placenta site, they can move directly into the larger
vessels in the mother's bloodstream and cause systemic infection
quite rapidly.
How can I minimize the dangers?
The
best way to avoid hospital-acquired infections is to avoid hospitals.
Consider the possibility of an out-of-hospital birth:
At
the AquaNatal Birth Spa, none of our personnel or students work
in a hospital. Therefore, they are NOT ABLE to bring VRE
or MRSA into the Birth Spa. Our equipment, tubs, etc. are
meticulously cleans after each clients’ use.
At home
- The best way to protect your baby from dangerous germs is to give
birth at home. It's very unlikely that VRE is present in your home,
unless you or someone else in your family became a carrier through
previous exposure to VRE. In addition, a baby born at home is always
kept very close to the mother, thereby ensuring that the mother
is exposed to the same germs the baby is exposed to. This allows
the mother's body to customize the antibodies in her breastmilk
to be exactly the ones her baby needs.
If your pregnancy
is complicated by high-risk factors that limit your out-of-hospital
options, you can still make choices that minimize your exposure
to hospital germs: